On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> On Mar 12, 2008, at 11:42 AM, Stephen Russell wrote:
>
> >> One change she made is to add music behind the show, if that is a
> >> clue.
> >>
> >> Any suggestions?
> >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > It may think that the audio is tagged to a specific slide instead
> > of the
> > "show" ?  So it is waiting for the audio to end before it will move
> > to the
> > next slide?
>
> On further research -- it appears that it is because the music is
> "linked" rather than "embedded." Of course, PP won't embed MP3 files,
> only WAV's, and those (by default) <= 100K. So, it seems that I need
> to convert those MP3's to WAV's (and 4x their size) and ask PP ever-
> so-nicely to accept those files. Then we watch PP get sucked into
> Vista Performance Hell because the file size is gonna be 60+ mB.
>
> Did I say that I hate M$ Orifice?
>
----------------------------------------------------------

We are having our own fits with PP from a print the slides POV.  They are
now coming in at around 60x the size compared to 2003s did.
We are getting complaints from customers that we broke something because the
files take so long to upload.


-- 
Stephen Russell
Sr. Production Systems Programmer
Mimeo.com
Memphis TN

901.246-0159


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to