Ricardo Araoz wrote:
> Michael Oke, II wrote:
>> Byte?  Obviously an mistake.
> 
> English lesson still smarting dude?
> Anyway, thanks for your implicit praise. You obviously think my english 
> is par with a native's and you correct me accordingly. (oops! sorry if I 
> made you google a couple of words).

When you provide me with an English lesson then perhaps I'll be 
"smarting".  Until that point, no.  No, I don't find your English to be 
anything to write home about but perhaps I can entice you to revisit 
what you wrote and find (or google) why you have typed in error.  Now I 
realize that there are some, you perhaps, that spend most of their day 
in google trying to figure out what others are saying I however, do not 
suffer from that malady.

> 
>> Everybody obviously doesn't know this fact as I was unaware that I was a 
>> "dumb racist".  Although I don't totally match your description as, by
>> birth, I am a Canadian and not a US'er.
> 
> I was not referring to you but to the poster of the remark. But hey! If 
> the shoe fits....
> 
Ah, you were replying to me ergo you made the assumption that I knew 
that all white, anglos were "dumb racists".  I was merely alerting you 
to the fact that I was unaware of this thereby making your assertion false.

>>  As the original post spoke of 
>> beating the mother-to-be and not the mother-in-law, perhaps you were 
>> confused.
> 
> <Irony>
> Ooohh! So sorry! That totally changes the racist slant. My fault!
> </Irony>
> 

Perhaps you should google the meaning of irony as what you've written 
hardly qualifies.

Oh and I'm still waiting for anyone to tell me what the original racist 
statement is/was.  I realize that it is politically correct to label any 
statement that doesn't fit with a rosy picture of the world as "racist" 
but that doesn't make it so.  While what was said might have been 
unpalatable and even untrue, I just want to know how that makes it racist.

::michael


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to