On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Charlie Coleman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 05:55 PM 3/26/2008 +0100, Jean Laeremans wrote: > > > > >At least it's honest... > > > > > > Well, not actually. At least no more honest than what he claims McDowell > > > is. E.g. leaving out information that is not supportive of his position. > > > > > > -Charlie > > > >Well Charlie i did oc refer to the name of the website. As far as its > >content is concerned i didn't bother to read it. > >Pro or contra it's all suppositions, assumptions anyway. Not my cup of tea. > > Ah. OK. > > The origin of the whole thing was Steve's question regarding did "we" > believe Jesus existed or not. To which John (I think) referenced MacDowell > who had done research into the topic (and concluded that Jesus did exist). >
I suppose Jesus was a historical figure, but where does that lead us..exactly nowhere. In the end religion is a believe system, if it could be proven there would be no need to believe... A+ jml _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
