On Wednesday 09 April 2008 16:49, Stephen Russell wrote: > > I think they only want two wars at a time. Invading Syria would be a > > third front and that would mean we would be in a, uh, World War? > > That would just extend the border of Iraq, or remove it. > > Sorry but that isn't a world war. Or a war to end all wars. It may be a > war to start a lot of little ones. But then we can give that title to Mr. > Bush.
Hi Stephen! Well, I think we should treat the war on terror as a World War, fully mobilize every fit person 18 to 45, convert to full military production and take out the whole axis of evil down to bare ground accepting that there will be some "civilian" casualties. The Ds however, still think that we are dealing with a small handful of criminals and we should let the police handle it. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
