On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Gil Hale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > But if you have a pirated copy of VFP9, you'd have the pirated CD. > > Schemes like this inconvenience legal users with no real benefit. > > Not if you borrowed the install CD <g>...
Or downloaded it using your MSDN subscription... > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Paul McNett > > Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 12:55 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: SP2 without VFP 9 CD? > > > > > > Gil Hale wrote: > > >> Why in the world would SP2 require the original CD I wonder. > > >> > > > > > > To prevent providing the SP2 update on a pirated copy of VFP. > > Sometimes the > > > updates seem to need one or more of the files on the original CD/DVD. I > > > personally subscribe to the anti-piracy thinking... > > > > But if you have a pirated copy of VFP9, you'd have the pirated CD. > > Schemes like this inconvenience legal users with no real benefit. > > > > Paul > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
