On Tuesday, April 29, 2008 11:55 AM Pete Theisen wrote: ><http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,352800,00.html>
>"I took part in a photo shoot that was supposed to be 'artistic' and now, seeing the photographs and reading the story, I feel so >embarrassed," >From the article: "Unfortunately, as the article suggests, a situation was created to deliberately manipulate a 15-year-old in order to sell magazines," a network statement said. It is stupid since her parents were there the whole time and had to approve it. I think they were trying to make her look older since Vanity Fair is not geared towards teenagers. Publicity is publicity - good or bad. To answer your question about how much did they Leibovitz. It doesn't matter. Vanity Fair got their money's worth in advertizing. David L. Crooks David L. Crooks _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
