> they deliberately obfuscate the license so that > they can interpret it however suits them best.
Uh, gee, does M$ actually do that? heh-heh... In my world I call that "Weasel-Wording". Gil > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ed Leafe > Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 9:08 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [NF] .Net need not apply > > > On Jun 1, 2008, at 9:00 AM, Allen wrote: > > > With a good solicitor they could do anything. M$ has proved that. > > > Sorry, no. Giving explicit license rights is not the same as what > Microsoft does. There, they deliberately obfuscate the license so that > they can interpret it however suits them best. > > -- Ed Leafe > > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
