On Monday, June 02, 2008 11:50 AM Ed Leafe wrote: > Better and faster than what?
Than previous versions (like you say below:)... > .Net is much better than the previous Windows development tools that preceeded it, but it isn't all that different than many of the >other development systems out there. They took Java and the library design of Java as their starting point, and developed a very similar >framework; they were smart enough to avoid some of the bad decisions made in Java (although not all!). > The current state-of-the-art for development in Java probably surpasses that of .Net, given Java's head start. So if you're looking >for an rich, IDE-based development environment, you've got your pick. I agree and since I work at MSFT shop that choice is .NET. David L. Crooks _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
