Michael,

If I recall correctly, I think you need a 32 characters key for AES256.
Perhaps you can test using PADR( cpassword, 32, ' ')

--michael


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of MB Software Solutions General Account
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 2:09 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: VFPEncryption.fll -- problem with decrypt

(vfp9sp1)

I must be having a brain fart.  I've downloaded Craig's VFPEncryption.fll
and am trying to do simple encrypt and decrypt with the AE256 option
(nEncryptionType=2)

* all passwords set to PASSWORD at this point for test set library to
vfpencryption.fll REPLACE ALL cpassword WITH
encrypt(ALLTRIM(luusers.cpassword)+CHR(0),"test!me",2) FOR NOT lencrypted
AND NOT EMPTY(cpassword)

I added the CHR(0) as I thought Craig said to do in the docs. 
Ok...seems to encrypt the values.  But when I decrypt, the value that
returns is NOT the original value.  Somehow, I'm screwing up how to handle
the CHR(0)s apparently.  Here's my DECRYPT command:

WAIT WINDOW decrypt(cpassword,"test!me",2) && return value is not even
close!


I did some derivative before that got me PASSWORD followed by some crap, 
but I can't seem to get back to what I did.

Can someone who uses this fine FLL help me out with their approach?  My 
inkling is to use the 1024 Encryption mode, but I'm sure my coworker 
will want to use the AE256 instead, so I want to get that option working.

TIA!!!
--Michael




[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to