Sytze de Boer wrote: > But not without saying THANK YOU > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 4:07 PM, MB Software Solutions General Account < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Sytze de Boer wrote: >>> It works fine with field width at 32, 64, 128, 192, 224 >> >> Case closed! Thanks for the feedback!
No problem, my friend. That's what ProFox is all about....helping other Foxers in the community. Most folks get that. (Sad, but others don't.) This kind of thing is all possible of course thanks to Ed Leafe hosting this site. Thanks again, EGL. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
