Bob Calco wrote: > I had in mind a person who has no identity-defining desire to rule the world > or run a bureaucracy, which eliminates almost 100% of all professional > politicians, Dubya included. I thought maybe Romney was such a guy (he > certainly knows how to run a successful business), and his early and > gracious bowing-out to McCain seems to support that idea. But he's out, and > I am quite certain McCain is too pig headed to consider him seriously for > VP.
For many elections, it seemed like the VP spot was a useless post and not one people really care about who ran on the ticket; but in today's election air, it really seems charged more than ever, imo. > > Of the professional politicians, I lean toward those who at least understand > on some level the dangers of their own unbridled good intentions. Dubya > proved not to be such a politician. :( OMG yes....I voted for him before, yet I can't wait to him to leave. What a freakin' terrible feeling. I almost (but not quite) wonder if Kerry would have been as bad. If I could go back to last election, I would probably have voted differently (...Nader!). <snipped> > In any case, I'm bumming this election cycle, big-time. > I can't think of one that I haven't felt like "oh no....which is the lesser of two evils. Can't I choose someone who's NOT a R or D?" _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
