Ed Leafe wrote: > On Jun 9, 2008, at 3:13 PM, MB Software Solutions General Account wrote: > >>> There is a large, vocal movement by disgruntled Clinton supporters >>> to >>> undermine the Obama candidacy. Something had to have been done in >>> some >>> sort of official capacity to result in such an unprecedented revolt. >> Really? I don't think so. Those folks were very passionate about >> Hillary. To have a mutiny against Obama wouldn't be hard to imagine, >> given the way it went down in the end with such a close race and the >> controversy with Florida/Michigan, popular vote vs. delegate vote, >> media >> bias, race card playing, etc. I think those folks would have done >> this >> without any kind of official doctrine from the HQ of Hillary's camp. > > > I think that that explanation is very insulting. It smacks of a sense > of entitlement, as if Clinton were somehow "owed" victory, and that > Obama's biggest affront was winning. > > And there was no controversy over FL/MI until Clinton herself raised > it, reversing her previously stated position on how to deal with those > delegates. When she was the front-runner, she said that the rules set > up ahead of time had to be followed; when she was trailing, she > changed her statements because that was her only chance to catch up to > Obama. You can't be bitter about a controversy that your own candidate > created.
I'm no Hillary supporter. I certainly agree that she seems to have some sense of entitlement, and I disagree that she's owed anything. She fought a good race perhaps but #2 doesn't get anything....it's #1's pick of who's the VP and the cabinet. She has such radical followers in some segments that they're these fanatical nutjobs who will basically bring down the Democratic party and give the election away....if there's enough of them....but I don't think her 18 million supporters are going to largely go for McCain. Unless BHO has some skeletons come out that are really deal-breakers, he's got my vote in November. I like what he said about not rewarding these companies who outsource but instead help companies who KEEP the jobs here in the U.S. I might have been a McCain fan but the mere fact of Carly Fiorina being on his team has basically crossed his name off my ballot. I'd love to hear them debate on outsourcing and rewarding/punishing those employers who help/hurt the American worker. I could be wrong about Fiorina but I don't think so. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
