Ed Leafe wrote: > On Jun 18, 2008, at 9:28 AM, MB Software Solutions General Account > wrote: > >> That was the key with the Fox --- it got the job done (quick and >> good!). >> Good, fast, and cheap...very possible with the Fox! lol! <g> > > > But in this case: good, fast, cheap and wrong. SQL was not created by > Fox; they implemented it incorrectly.
Correct....so technically it was "good enough (but syntactically wrong), fast, and cheap." _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
