Where in the story was the word 'brain' used?  You missed the entire
argument against duality...apparently.

v/r
 

//SIGNED//

Stephen S. Wolfe, YA2, DAF
6th MDG Data Services Manager
6th MDG Information System Security Officer
Comm (813) 827-9994  DSN 651-9994

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ed Leafe
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 2:54 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] why some people get the God story.

On Jul 25, 2008, at 1:44 PM, Wolfe, Stephen S Civ USAF AMC 6 MDSS/SGSI  
wrote:

> Ed, did the story above make any sense?


        It uses duplicate meanings of several scientific terms. If you
follow  
the conversation, you can see the premises being set up in very  
specific ways, all leading to the grand finale punchline. It  
completely ignores several fundamental scientific principles in its  
quest to appear to make belief in the supernatural as credible as  
belief in the natural.

        Example: no, no one has seen the professor's brain. However,
there  
have been thousands and thousands of humans whose insides *have* been  
seen; enough to establish that all living human beings possess certain  
critical organs. It has not been proven that the professor has a  
brain; however, science would indicate that the person claiming  
otherwise would have to supply the evidence to support it, given the  
understanding of human physiology.

        Things such as this are the equivalent of parlor tricks,
designed for  
people insecure in the faith to pat themselves on the back and  
reassure themselves. If you need this sort of deception in order to  
feel good about your beliefs, then I would suggest that that is a sign  
of deeper issues.

-- Ed Leafe





[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to