The Equirer now has passed the Washington Post and New York Times for excellence in journalism.
************************************************************************ Right Wing Mike http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike Bigfoot Hates Obama http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/5690856 I Wish Hillary had married OJ http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/4236924 --- On Sun, 8/10/08, KAM.covad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: KAM.covad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [OT] Edwards admits sexual affair; lied as presidential candidate > To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]> > Date: Sunday, August 10, 2008, 6:50 PM > Poor Edwards, I'll bet he is sick that she won't > submit his baby to a paternity test. That would clear his > good name so he could be > vice president or even president. I am sure of this because > I know how Clinton could not wait until they ran the tests > on Monica's > blue dress. How silly of him. Does he really think he can > avoid leaving dna somewhere? I'll bet the enquirer > already has it. I'll > also bet a nurse got a cheek swab of the baby also. > I'll bet they already have the results from 3 or 4 > different testing labs. The > enquirer says they will be releasing more information > between now and the election. You can bet that will dominate > the news. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Michael Madigan" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]> > Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2008 12:47 AM > Subject: RE: [OT] Edwards admits sexual affair; lied as > presidential candidate > > > Maybe these two souless reptiles can go on the Maury Povich > show for a paternity test. > > She doesn't have to identify the father, all she has to > do is eliminate Edwards as the father. > > He's the father. Duh. > > ************************************************************************ > Right Wing Mike > > http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike > > Bigfoot Hates Obama > > http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/5690856 > > I Wish Hillary had married OJ > > http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/4236924 > > --- On Sat, 8/9/08, Bob Calco > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: Bob Calco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [OT] Edwards admits sexual affair; lied as > presidential candidate > To: "'ProFox Email List'" > <[email protected]> > Date: Saturday, August 9, 2008, 9:50 PM > > The Saga Continues: Now ex mistress RULES OUT a paternity > test because (get > this!) the father is a private individual who wishes to > maintain the privacy > of her and her daughter. > > http://apnews.myway.com/article/20080809/D92F23U00.html > > LOL! > > Edwards must be enraged! Why, his good name could finally > be cleared if only > he could get a paternity test! > > Jeez, these people are so transparent. > > - Bob > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf Of Michael Madigan > > Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2008 3:38 PM > > To: ProFox Email List > > Subject: RE: [OT] Edwards admits sexual affair; lied > as presidential > > candidate > > > > N A R C I S S I S T ! > > > > Remove all narcissists from your life, they are a > drain on you > > emotionally, financially and every other way. They > will never be there > > when you need them, they will always use you when they > can. The world > > revolves around them. They are unable to walk in > anyones shoes. They > > are perhaps the worst type of person there is. > > > > > *********************************************************************** > > * > > Right Wing Mike > > > > http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike > > > > Bigfoot Hates Obama > > > > http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/5690856 > > > > I Wish Hillary had married OJ > > > > http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/4236924 > > > > --- On Sat, 8/9/08, Bob Calco > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > From: Bob Calco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: RE: [OT] Edwards admits sexual affair; lied > as presidential > > candidate > > To: "'ProFox Email List'" > <[email protected]> > > Date: Saturday, August 9, 2008, 10:28 AM > > > > Another thing about this that kills me: > > > > http://www.knbc.com/politics/17136911/detail.html > > > > "In 2006, I made a serious error in judgment and > conducted myself in > a > > way > > that was disloyal to my family and to my core beliefs. > I recognized my > > mistake and I told my wife that I had a liaison with > another woman, and > > I > > asked for her forgiveness. Although I was honest in > every painful > > detail > > with my family, I did not tell the public. When a > supermarket tabloid > > told a > > version of the story, I used the fact that the story > contained many > > falsities to deny it. But being 99 percent honest is > no longer enough. > > > > "I was and am ashamed of my conduct and choices, > and I had hoped that > > it > > would never become public. With my family, I took > responsibility for my > > actions in 2006 and today I take full responsibility > publicly. But that > > misconduct took place for a short period in 2006. It > ended then. I am > > and > > have been willing to take any test necessary to > establish the fact that > > I am > > not the father of any baby, and I am truly hopeful > that a test will be > > done > > so this fact can be definitively established. I only > know that the > > apparent > > father has said publicly that he is the father of the > baby. I also have > > not > > been engaged in any activity of any description that > requested, agreed > > to or > > supported payments of any kind to the woman or to the > apparent father > > of the > > baby. > > > > "It is inadequate to say to the people who > believed in me that I am > > sorry, > > as it is inadequate to say to the people who love me > that I am sorry. > > In the > > course of several campaigns, I started to believe that > I was special > > and > > became increasingly egocentric and narcissistic. If > you want to beat me > > up > > -- feel free. You cannot beat me up more than I have > already beaten up > > myself. I have been stripped bare and will now work > with everything I > > have > > to help my family and others who need my help. > > > > "I have given a complete interview on this matter > and having done so, > > will > > have nothing more to say." > > > > --- > > > > So let's parse this: > > > > "When a supermarket tabloid told a version of the > story, I used the > > fact > > that the story contained many falsities to deny it. > But being 99 > > percent > > honest is no longer enough." > > > > a. The fact he was banging this lady in 2006 and met > her at 2am in a > > hotel > > just last month was only 1% of the truth? > > > > b. Politicians are held to a higher standard today? > > > > Is he serious? > > > > "I was and am ashamed of my conduct and choices, > and I had hoped that > > it > > would never become public. With my family, I took > responsibility for my > > actions in 2006 and today I take full responsibility > publicly. But that > > misconduct took place for a short period in 2006. It > ended then." > > > > So what? The very next year he was out spouting how > important marital > > fidelity was to the presidency, knowing full well he > put his family > > through > > that ordeal (if we believe his version of this story) > the very year > > before--as if he somehow measured up, gee, just look > what a loving > > family he > > has, his wife even lets him run despite a renewed bout > with terminal > > cancer. > > What a Leave It To Beaver family! > > > > "I am and have been willing to take any test > necessary to establish > the > > fact > > that I am not the father of any baby, and I am truly > hopeful that a > > test > > will be done so this fact can be definitively > established. I only know > > that > > the apparent father has said publicly that he is the > father of the > > baby. I > > also have not been engaged in any activity of any > description that > > requested, agreed to or supported payments of any kind > to the woman or > > to > > the apparent father of the baby." > > > > Hmmm. OK, well, that makes the paternity test > inevitable. Let's > suppose > > it's > > not his kid and it is instead that of this Andrew > Young guy. > > > > Apparently his campaign was passing this babe around > like a piece pipe. > > Yet > > nobody knew! > > > > How plausible is any of this? Not very. > > > > A minor point: "I am not the father of any > baby"--he did not > specify > > "of > > this woman"... so is he denying his three kids by > Elizabeth as well? > I > > know, > > I know--a bit pedantic. But still--this part of it > reads like a legal > > claim > > and I couldn't help but notice, especially > considering he's a > lawyer > > like > > Derr Schlickmeister and loves to load nuance into his > messages. This > > may > > help explain some of Elizabeth's mysterious > cooperativeness. > > > > "In the course of several campaigns, I started to > believe that I was > > special > > and became increasingly egocentric and > narcissistic." > > > > (You don't say!) > > > > "If you want to beat me up -- feel free. You > cannot beat me up more > > than I > > have already beaten up myself." > > > > Translation: I am still such a narcissist that I > don't even think YOU > > can > > beat me up as bad as I can beat me up. > > > > I'm "too sexy for my smackdown, too sexy for > my > smackdown..." > > > > "I have been stripped bare and will now work with > everything I have > to > > help > > my family and others who need my help." > > > > Translation: I am still such a narcissist that I > believe my family and > > other > > people actually need *my* help. > > > > Is this guy a piece of work or what? > > > > Let's go back to the rub of the matter though: > > > > "I also have not been engaged in any activity of > any description that > > requested, agreed to or supported payments of any kind > to the woman or > > to > > the apparent father of the baby." > > > > OK, so the limiting verbs (assuming of course he's > being truthful) are > > "request," "agreed to" and > "supported". He > could > > very well have simply > > "implied" or "turned a willful blind > eye toward" and > > otherwise "trusted that > > his handlers knew what to do"--even to the point > of jumping on the > > sword > > for > > him (thank you, Andrew!). He also here does NOT deny > he "knew" > about > > such > > arrangements. > > > > Anyway. > > > > Also note Bonior's reaction (Bonior was his > campaign manager in his > > presidential bid, another perfectly corrupt Dem): > > > > http://www.knbc.com/politics/17135521/detail.html > > > > --- > > David Bonior, Edwards' campaign manager for his > 2008 presidential bid, > > said > > he was disappointed and angry at Friday's news. > > > > "Thousands of friends of the senator's and > his supporters have > put > > their > > faith and confidence in him, and he's let them > down," said > Bonior, a > > former > > congressman from Michigan. "They've been > betrayed by his > action." > > > > Asked whether the affair would damage Edwards' > future aspirations in > > public > > service, Bonior replied: "You can't lie in > politics and expect to > have > > people's confidence." > > --- > > > > LOL! The only thing these people are angry about is > the fact the news > > got > > out on Friday -- i.e., that they got caught, and had > to admit it, they > > and > > their media sycophants, all of whom HAD to know about > this, it simply > > isn't > > conceivable that they didn't know about it. There > are way too many > > moving > > parts in this story. > > > > Everything was honky dory until even the Enquirer was > able to unearth > > the > > obvious facts, and they got out. (See my other post > about the media's > > "excuse" for missing the story: > "Journalism is so gosh darn > > hard!") > > > > On one level, who cares about his private life, right? > Well, the bigger > > issue is the layers of deception these politicians > pile up, and how the > > media selectively deals with them. No wonder people > read the > > Enquirer... you > > can't trust the New York Times and other major > "news" > outlets to > > do the > > investigative work, particularly if the politician is > a Democrat. > > > > - Bob > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > > Behalf Of Bob Calco > > > Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2008 8:54 AM > > > To: 'ProFox Email List' > > > Subject: RE: [OT] Edwards admits sexual affair; > lied as presidential > > > candidate > > > > > > MSNBC put out this puff piece exonerating the > media for missing the > > > story: > > > > > > http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26099046/ > > > > > > Summary: Journalism is hard! > > > > > > I guess they should leave it to the professionals > at the Enquirer. > > They > > > didn't seem to have any problem following > Edwards around and > catching > > > him in > > > some kind of plain-sight meeting at a well-known > hotel, or following > > > his > > > babe around the various mansions she was put up > at over the last two > > > years. > > > > > > Everybody is so shocked, now--shocked, I tell > you! > > > > > > What doesn't add up for me is Elizabeth's > behavior. If she > knew he > > did > > > this, > > > how could she tolerate his hypocrisy, and act > like his campaign was > > > more > > > important for the good of the world than her > battle with cancer, when > > > he was > > > interviewed and said how important marital > fidelity was as a > > > qualification > > > for the presidency? > > > > > > - Bob > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On > > > > Behalf Of Michael Madigan > > > > Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2008 12:23 AM > > > > To: ProFox Email List > > > > Subject: Re: [OT] Edwards admits sexual > affair; lied as > > presidential > > > > candidate > > > > > > > > So why was he in the Beverly Hills hotel > with the woman if the > kid > > > > isn't his and he's no longer banging > her? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/%(listmsgid)s ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
