On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 8:08 AM, Jeff Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul:  Thank you for finding that, but the reason I brought it up is
> that I have been increasingly frustrated with finding answers quickly
> using any of the available search engines.  I just happen to have two
> examples.
>
> It is interesting that you all seem to be more interested in the Olympic
> snit than Linux serial ports.  Oh well.
>
> The little snit that knocked me over at the San Diego airport and yelled
> at her parents at the top of her lungs was Shannon Miller.  She was
> actually in the 1996 Olympics but I "met" her in 1999 (or there abouts).
>
> I don't suppose there is a search engine that finds topics based on
> there relevance to the query, is there?
-------------------------

you use Firefox?

add to try is Xippee.  When you get 2000 pages of results you
highlight the text in the return from google and it will sub-search on
that.  Very cool and effective.



-- 
Stephen Russell
Sr. Production Systems Programmer
Mimeo.com
Memphis TN

901.246-0159


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to