I guess we all know who are the real intellectually dishonest people in this thread.
HW On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Leland F. Jackson, CPA < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Charlie Coleman wrote: > >> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Leland F. Jackson, CPA < > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > >>> Rebutting specific FUD published by some of the members of OT would be > a > >>> never ending job. LOL. The FUD usually contain some slivers of > truth, > >>> > > ... > > > > > >>> Michael Oke, II wrote: > >>> > >>>> You state that all the points listed below would fail the "No FUD" > test > >>>> but fail to provide even one shred of a rebuttal. Please, feel free > >>>> > >> to do so so that those of us > >> > > ... > > > > At 01:40 PM 8/23/2008 -0300, Helio Wakasugui wrote: > > > > > >> *http://tinyurl.com/ynlkrz > >> > > > > Thus, Helio provides a link to the definition of Intellectual dishonesty > > with no explanation as to how this applies to the discussion at hand. > > > > So, it seems Helio is: > > > > a) implying Leland is being intellectually dishonest since he is not > > offering to provide any actual contrary evidence > > b) implying Michael is being intellectually dishonest by asking for > details > > c) or maybe Helio is simply being intellectually dishonest himself, > > muddying the waters in the discussion (maybe unintentionally) > > > > Given Helio's past wild diversions off of message content and the actual > > point of the discussion, I suppose c) would be the most likely answer. > > > > But the upside is that link does give us a good criteria by which we > could > > judge a politician. In other words, all of them can certainly check the > box > > beside the "ID" item. > > > > :-) > > > > Now, to bring things back to the actual thread, Leland, do you have any > > sources that directly refute any of the information Bob had provided? > > > > -Charlie > > > > > > > Bob's comment carry no weight; because, they are all based on innuendo, > guilt by association, rumors, hearsay, ( eg basically FUD), etc, so > there is nothing there to refute. Perhaps you would like to help Bob by > providing substantiated proof that Obama is anything other than a > selfless servant of the American, who loves America and the American way > of life. > > Regards, > > LelandJ > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
