Ed Leafe wrote: > On Aug 30, 2008, at 8:49 PM, John wrote: > >> Tell me you don't really think they raided this house sans warrant! > > They had a warrant. Nobody stated otherwise; if you read the article > you'd know that that was expressly stated. The problem is that the > grounds for the warrant, as far as they've allowed people to see, were > extremely vague. The show of force, with an attack that included swat > team-like armor and weaponry, were completely out of proportion to the > situation. There were no weapons of any sort on any of the premises, > nor was there any indication that weapons were present. > > This was a show of force designed to intimidate anyone thinking of > protesting the upcoming convention. Period.
Hi Ed! What if the video is a hoax? -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
