William Sanders / EFG wrote: > Vince - I dunno - > > I don't see the same wording in the online version of the privacy > statement over at > http://www.google.com/chrome/intl/en/privacy.html > > Maybe that author got something else?
LOL, after reading the above, I remembered that in Chrome, the Omnibox is a combination of search and address, bar, so I opened Chrome and typed in "Chrome EULA" This is the first hit I got: Google, Criticized for Harsh Chrome EULA, Backs Down By Larry Seltzer <http://www.pcmag.com/author_bio/0,1908,a=6775,00.asp> They've already issued an "Our Bad" and retracted the offending language, but Google </topic/0,2944,t=Google%20Inc&s=1489,00.asp>'s initial EULA (End User License Agreement) for their Chrome </topic/0,2944,t=Google%20Chrome&s=1489,00.asp> browser was seriously offensive. (Rest of article here: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2329414,00.asp ) <http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2329414,00.asp> _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
