Adam Buckland wrote: > Please change the category for this and stop wasting bandwidth, this > is clearly not either [OT] or [NF] and just demonstrates the laziness > of people that can't be bothered to consider that this is far too off > topic for off topic and is demonstrably not not foxpro so should be > classified [IF] for Is Foxpro related. > > Hi Adam, I'm new to this group. Please can you explain me what [OT] and [NF] mean in this group? Till now I'm used to use [OT] as Off Topic mark from other groups.
Thanks. Petr Vileta, Czech republic (My server rejects all messages from Yahoo and Hotmail. Send me your mail from another non-spammer site please.) _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
