Maxine Waters, Franklin Raines, Gregory Meeks....what do they all have in common? They're all corrupt Black politicians. Add that to a corrupt homosexual politician in Barney Fagg, and you've got a "perfect storm" of disaster.
These people need to be publicly flogged. ************************************************************************ On Wednesday, November 5th, Vote for Barack Obama Right Wing Mike http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike --- On Mon, 10/6/08, Bob Calco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Bob Calco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [OT] Obama & Odinga > To: "'ProFox Email List'" <[email protected]> > Date: Monday, October 6, 2008, 11:56 AM > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf Of Michael Madigan > > Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 10:42 AM > > To: ProFox Email List > > Subject: Re: [OT] Obama & Odinga > > > > There is a news blackout on all of this. The media > wants Obama to win > > and it looks like he will. The press chose the > President. Not exactly > > what our founding fathers envisioned. > > > > It's almost as bad as the blackout about what started > this financial mess. > The myth is that it's "greed on wall street" > and there's always some truth > to that cliché. In fact, the more proximate cause is > Fannie Mae and Freddie > Mac's "cooking the books" Enron-style with > government blessing under Raines > (now an economic advisor to Obama, don'chya know?) > --whom the Dems praised > just a few short years ago, while they were in denial about > the practices > that are today at the root of the scandal--namely, > high-risk lending. > > Heard some great audio from Barney Frank ("I'd > like to roll the dice a > little more on this...") and Maxine Waters denying at > the time (2004) there > was any problem whatsoever at Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae, > and extolling the > virtues of what Raines was doing there at the time. > > None of this will make it on the View, or Oprah, or even > the nightly news. > The NYT piece on Ayers was intended to be a whitewash > ("There, we wrote > about it finally, nothing to see, shut up, let's move > on..."), but hopefully > McCain and the Republicans will be smart enough to use it > as a pretext for > opening the floodgates on Obama's truly, astonishingly > radical background. > > He is not who he says he is, and the change he's > promising isn't the change > he's going to bring. His closest advisors and even his > VP candidate are part > of the institutional problems that are giving his > "message" a boost, and his > long-time friends, backers and "spiritual > mentors" are the most sordid > variety of leftwing extremists... I feel like Orwell's > 1984 is 24 years > late, but here it is. > > - Bob > > > > _______________________________________________ > Post Messages to: [email protected] > Subscription Maintenance: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox > This message: > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are > the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or > medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for > those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
