Ted Roche wrote: > Hmm. Your properly labeled OT post came across the -tech list, as it > was encoded funny... > > =?iso-8859-1?Q?=5BOT=5D_U.S._Investigates_Voting_Machines'_Venezuela_Ties_?= > > Ed, can you add > > =5BOT=5D > > to the list of variations you filter for OT-flagged topics? > > There was a great debate in the last ACM "Communications of the ACM" > on the Pros and Cons of electronic voting. I think the HAVA Act was > disasterous, and we don't have a means of reliably auditing any > computer system that doesn't use paper ballots. Diebold and Sierra and > their ilk need to go back to square one and have some computer > scientists actually create a reliable machine. Who really cares if it > takes a week to count the ballots?
I agree that it's absolutely INSANE to not have a paper trail to support the computer outcomes. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
