Whoops, I hit "send" before having a chance to read my post: #------------------------
It doesn't make sense that Timothy M. Kaine, governor of Virginia, would have been motivated by the Presidential election to pardon 1,500 felons; because, the risk of using this method to rig a presidential election would be extremely high for essential little or no gain, as well as extremely inefficient. You guys need to stop assigning sinister motives to every action that can somehow be associated with the Presidential election. 1) A felcon can be either Republican or Democrat, so there is no way to know how many Republican votes would have resulted form pardoning 1,500 felons. 2) A felon is less likely to vote than a non-felon. 3) President Elect Obama didn't need these votes, especially these kinds of votes, so why take a huge risk that's going to be scrutinized carefully by the press regardless of motive.? Vote in Virginia: Obama 1,792,502 52% McCain 1,637,338 47% #-------------------------------- Regards, LelandJ James Roark(The Dogstar Group) wrote: > David McKay wrote: > >> Larry, >> Do you have a source for your claim of 1700 felons pardoned by Kaine? >> Haven't heard anything about it here in the Shenandoah Valley, and the folks >> here have little love for the Gov. >> David McKay >> >> >> > http://www.inrich.com/cva/ric/news.apx.-content-articles-RTD-2008-10-24-0185.html > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
