I've met the man, you have too high an opinion of him. He's as partisan as anyone. When ACORN types were registering college kids, he met with the Obama campaign and the Secretary of the Board of Elections twice, and after the final meeting, the registrars were told that it was not their responsibility to insure that the students were qualified as residents and that they should take the students word for it.
After that the chairman of our 3rd congressional district ran a comparison of voter registrations with just several counties in PA and found over 300 duplicates... some had already cast ballots in both locations. The plan was to pursue these kids, as the crime is a felony. How is that for screwing up your life? Why would an honest administration seek to obscure and protect such behavior? Whether the votes were needed this time or not, the Ds were doing everything they could to fudge the system. Why is it the left is always so blind to such shinnanigans and is unwilling to accept the depth of corruption that is evident to anyone with at least half a brain. I will also admit that not all Rs are willing to after one of their own, but Sarahcuda did. I helped take out a county supervisor who was in bed with the developers, and like to think that I helped another decide not to run again. Most Rs will agree that it doesn't matter what party a pol is from, if they are corrupt, they should go. Hear that, Ted Stevens? Don't go all self righteous on me about the Ds. Barney Frank had a 'gay escort' service running out his place in DC and NOTHING HAPPENED! So I hope you will pardon those of us who look at most Ds and see someone who, if they are not corrupt themselves, is at least accepting of it in others if it helps them toward their goals. Larry Miller ----- Original Message ----- From: Leland F. Jackson, CPA To: ProFox Email List Sent: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 15:22:31 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [OT] President Obama If doesn't make sense that Timothy M. Kaine, governor of Virginia, would have been motivated by the Presidential election to pardon 1,500 felons; because, the risk of using this method to rig an presidential election would be extremely high for essential no rewards, as well as extreme inefficient. You guys need to stop assigning sinister election manipulating motives to every action that can somehow be associated with the Presidential election. 1) A felcon can be either a Republican or a Democrat, so there is no way to know how many votes Republican votes would have resulted for pardoning 1,500 felons. 2) A felon is less likely to vote than a non-felon. 3) 1,500 votes is pretty insignificant in a presidential election. 4) President Elect Obama didn't need these votes, espcially these kinds of votes, so why take a huge risk that going to be scrutinized carefully by the press regardless of motive.? Vote in Virginia: Obama 1,792,502 52% McCain 1,637,338 47% Regards, LelandJ James Roark(The Dogstar Group) wrote: > David McKay wrote: > >> Larry, >> Do you have a source for your claim of 1700 felons pardoned by Kaine? >> Haven't heard anything about it here in the Shenandoah Valley, and the folks >> here have little love for the Gov. >> David McKay >> >> >> > http://www.inrich.com/cva/ric/news.apx.-content-articles-RTD-2008-10-24-0185.html > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
