Geoff Flight wrote: > The world has changed since WW2. Due process does involve making sure the > person you incarcerated is actually an enemy combatant. What about the > number that have been released from there and no charges have ever been laid > either in the US or in their own countries? I have no problem with > terrorists being locked up but it is part of the democratic process that you > so love to talk about that everyone has their day in court or at least some > kind of reasonable tribunal to determine their status. Guantanamo is s stain > on your reputation and the sooner it is gone the better. You have the > capability to treat terrorists with due process and so you should. Chuck in > jail for life; I don't care, but AFTER due process. Even in WW2 the Nazis > sent citizens of some uninvolved countries home. Granted, not many but at > least they did that for some. Aspiring to behave better than Nazis isn't > that much of a challenge. >
We have a saying : " Que le hace una mancha mas al tigre ". Look it up. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
