> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Geoff Flight > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 3:20 PM > To: 'ProFox Email List' > Subject: RE: [OT] White "minority" rights? > > Is there any value in telling you that these kinds of comments are > definitionally racist? >
No more than there is any value in telling you that your constant harping on Pete's alleged racism is a lazy mind's attempt to look self-important to whoever it is you're trying to impress on this list--definitionally speaking, it's tartuffery. I don't especially like Pete's "pet phrases" for things, and have shared that with him; but I defend his right to express himself however he wants, as much as I defend your right to huff-puffery. I think the whole whoop-tee-doo over his being "the first black president," for example, not to mention the pigeonholing of every non-Obama voter as racist, is also racist. The debate sadly has shifted from the more significant fact that he is an illegal, Manchurian candidate who has actually gotten elected, and is now about to dismantle the United States, to the utter delight of her enemies everywhere, including those within our borders who knowingly voted for this fraud, and those abroad who colluded in his mysterious rise to power. I'm totally against him based on Federalist #59: "It ought never to be forgotten that a firm union of this country, under an efficient government, will probably be an increasing object of jealousy to more than one nation of Europe; and that enterprises to subvert it will sometimes originate in the intrigues of foreign powers and will seldom fail to be patronized and abetted by some of them. Its preservation, therefore, ought in no case that can be avoided to be committed to the guardianship of any but those whose situation will uniformly beget an immediate interest in the faithful and vigilant performance of the trust." Obama has said he wants to "fundamentally change" this country. He has stated that he thinks the Constitution is "fundamentally flawed" to this day. He claims to be Christian, but his church of 20 years is rooted in Marxist "Liberation Theology" of the "Black Power" variety, and he has an extensive history of working with and being supported by extreme, even murderous, radicals who hate this country. I know he's a devotee of Saul Alinsky, the Marxist who invented the very idea of "community organizers," and who wrote a book on acquiring power (Rules for Radicals) that makes Machiavelli look like the Marquis of Queensbury. I also know he's supported the communist thug Raila Odinga in Kenya *as a US senator* in the election he lost a year ago---even after Odinga orchestrated nationwide riots that resulted in nearly 2,000 dead (including women and children burned alive in church buildings), a stunt that won him the Prime Minister position he currently enjoys--unelected. On no level can I muster any enthusiasm for Obama's victory. It's a very dangerous moment for the survival of this republic, as a very dangerous person is about to, in his recent words to Barbara Walters, "take the reins of power." To answer your earlier question about the birth certificate issue: Yes, the once-in-a-lifetime shot to do to this country what he and his backers want done to it is worth every deceit and subterfuge. - Bob _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
