Adam:
>
> On balance I'd accept that as a trade...
>
> The electoral college would elect someone else, couldn't see anyone
> wanting a complete rerun given that the US is now officially in
> recession, ie 1/2 a year of -ve growth.
>
Actually that would be the Constitutional way to solve the problem... the
electors would simply be free to hash it out, instead of it being a boring
rubber-stamp ceremony. It used to be that way, incidentally, before all that
democratic (small 'd') nonsense corrupted our republican (small 'r') system.
I never thought I'd say this but if I had a choice I'd take Hitlery! over
Obama any day. (Now I have to go take a shower.)
...
OK, I'm back.
Cons:
They are both leftist Alinsky-ites.
Both are know-it-all, smartest-person-in-the-room-just-ask-me,
hand-me-your-wallet-you-moron pork-barrel largesse dispensationalists, who
hate everything I believe in at a metaphysical level.
Both will use identity politics to wedge everybody into a glorious socialist
future (always, to be sure, "on the horizon," but not quite yet, we still
have to get rid of any and all opposition to the will of the people, i.e.,
free speech; just like in the USSR)
Pros:
But Hitlery! (as best I can tell, and on a comparative basis to Obama)
doesn't fundamentally hate this country, and wasn't weened on the incredibly
evil "Black Liberation Theology" poison or even plain ol' "Liberation
Theology" poison. She may have hung out with domestic terrorists, but was
smart enough at least not to start her career in the home of two of the
worst of them.
She's been, through her philandering husband and her own success at branding
herself a victim, "corrupted" by capitalism and does it more for the ego
trip than anything else, whereas Obama is fundamentally a fraud and deeply
psychologically conflicted, all the way down to the core of his identity.
Barry or Barack? You decide! His bad relations with both parents, and
grandparents, and mysterious birth circumstances all belie an enigmatic
black hole of a psyche. His only work in corporate America he writes about
as if he was "a spy in behind enemy lines." Even Hitlery! doesn't hate
business THAT much.
I think they both have sociopathic tendencies, but Obama's is far more
dangerous because he has learned how to conceal it and make it look like
"hope" and "inclusion". He even wrote about this in his books, or had Ayers
help him write about it, anyway. But of course nobody reads this stuff, they
just swoon that he is SO SMART because he wrote memoirs, even before he ever
did anything in life.
Hitlery! wears her ambition on her face and can barely contain her contempt
for people, which is a nice feature because it implies at least some kind of
basic honesty, or in any case inability to fake basic emotions.
So, I'll enjoy a nice single malt in celebration of that fine idea, Adam!
(Aye, I know it's a doomed thought, but while the electors have not yet done
the dirty deed of ratifying the plebiscite, there is still hope...) Let the
electors do their job and pick a President, just... NOT OBAMA!
:)
- Bob
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
