We have used Intuit for the past 11 years. Their integration with QuickBooks is 
the best we have ever used. We used ADP previously 
for over 15 years and it was a nightmare trying to read those reports (for 
example when you file the workman's comp). Also, you end 
up with 2 sets of books since they don't integrate with your bookkeeping system.

I have to add that QuickBooks is something like Microsoft in that they make 
changes just so they can force you to upgrade - they 
tell you that you need to upgrade in order to keep using the payroll. The 
upgrades usually mess things up just like Microsoft so 
you have 10 months of frustration trying to find things. They move things 
around and change the names. Maybe they hired some of the 
stupid software designers from Microsoft. I would rather just pay a toll now 
and then and keep the program I know how to use.



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gil Hale" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 8:07 PM
Subject: RE: [NF] MicroSoft Exchange Training


ADP and Paychex both have excellent services also.

Gil

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]on Behalf Of Michael Madigan
> Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 10:22 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [NF] MicroSoft Exchange Training
>
>
> If you do your own payroll and you mess up, you're open to all
> kinds of fines from the IRS and legal action from the employee.
> If EDS screws up, they're liable for it.
>
> They handle all the deposits, the direct deposits, the payments
> to the IRS, payments to the state, and to the city.
>
> And they are experts in what they do.
>
>
> --- On Mon, 12/22/08, Ed Leafe <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > From: Ed Leafe <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: [NF] MicroSoft Exchange Training
> > To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]>
> > Date: Monday, December 22, 2008, 9:16 PM
> > On Dec 22, 2008, at 9:10 PM, Andrew Stirling wrote:
> >
> > > In the UK you have to keep 3 years of payroll records,
> > that does not
> > > include the current year.
> > > For Accounts you have to keep 7 years records, again
> > that does not
> > > include the current year.
> > > The Revenue may well be asked how your accounts
> > produced that wage
> > > bill,
> > > in other other words you have to keep 8 years worth of
> > payroll!!!!
> > >
> > > I think an online system will not be able to do this.
> > > If you shut your business you will have to keep your
> > subscription
> > > going
> > > for 8 years after you finish!!
> > >
> > > When I think of the changes that have occurred over
> > the past 5 years,
> > > let alone 8 years in the Payroll system then it is
> > quite mind boggling
> > > to think that a current payroll can resolve all the
> > adjustments.
> >
> >
> > I'm not talking about an online payroll program, or
> > anything that
> > simple. I'm talking about companies such as Paychex or
> > EDS or several
> > others that handle everything to do with payroll, including
> > reporting
> > and archiving records. If you get audited, you are *much*
> > better off
> > having a certified company like this, as they don't
> > miss a trick. They
> > have people who do nothing except keep up with the tax
> > laws, in order
> > to make sure that their clients are not exposed to any
> > liability,
> > because it would cost the payroll company as much if not
> > more.
> >
> >
> > -- Ed Leafe
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Post Messages to: [email protected]
> > Subscription Maintenance:
> > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
> > OT-free version of this list:
> > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
> > Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
> > This message:
> >
> http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/7ECD96C2-DB01-42F4-B406-7AA
[email protected]
> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are
> the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or
> medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for
> those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/006c01c9653e$ac8cdbe0$8600a...@w2k3s02
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to