.. see below

On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Joe Yoder <[email protected]> wrote:

> My long term goal is to develop any number of classes to use in various
> projects in the same way I have used functions and procedures.  My approach
> in FPD was to keep the general functions and procedures in a folder that was
> included on the path.  This allowed me to access my udfs just like the
> Foxpro components and allowed me to eliminate needing to "set procedure".
>
> My first "define class" code is in a classes.prg file which needs to be
> named in a "set procedure" statement.



>   Do all my coded classes need to be handled the same way  >>>  No. Visual
> classlibs can be used via set classlib to ... and/or newobject(<Class>,
> <Library>).



> or can coded classes be in individual files in a folder that is on the path
> just like I handled functions and procedures?

>>> nope, there's no function name is the same as the .prg name
functionality.

>
>
> When I advance to subclassing my coded classes - Can that code be included
> in the same folder or procedure file?

>>> Sure, but they needn't be.

>
>
> I know that Visual classes can be stored in libraries.  Can they also be
> stored separately in folders and located by placing the folder on the path?

>>> Nope. They're located via set classlib to and/or
newobejct(...,<Classlib/program>

Is it advisable/possible to include a subclass of a subclass of a visual
class in the same library?
>>> Depends on your programming style. Sometimes yes, sometimes no.

ual class in code.  Is it possible to subclass a coded class visually?

>>> nope

Thanks in advance,

Joe Yoder


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
 text/plain (text body -- kept)
 text/html
---

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to