When I simply questioned that XML may not necessarily be appropriate at times your response to me was a tad less than generous. Like Stephen, your replies were definitely in the blinkered 'evangelist' corner. My only 'mission' was to get an answer to a genuine question. What I got in response was mainly dogma
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ed Leafe Sent: Friday, 16 January 2009 7:27 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [NF] M$ is pushing ahead for performance On Jan 15, 2009, at 2:32 PM, Geoff Flight wrote: > Or the mantra of the XML evangelist. Seriously? Do you see me as an "XML Evangelist"? To be honest, you seem to be the one on a mission here. -- Ed Leafe [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
