I think FLUSH should be ok as long as you WASH before returning to work. On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Michael J. Babcock, MCP < [email protected]> wrote:
> We've got a VFP9SP1 app here that uses free tables, and there's one table > that seems to get corrupted quite frequently. The code was retooled so > the procedure that wrote to the table did so a bit cleaner by replacing a > lot of append/replace commands with direct INSERT INTOs. We think that > should help. But there's a line in the code that says "FLUSH IN MyTable" > and I hadn't seen that before. I confess I've heard folks talk of FLUSH > here in the past but I hadn't used it myself. Some folks say that FLUSH > definitely helps, but is there any reason where FLUSH would HURT or CAUSE > ISSUES? I'm on the mindset to leave it alone unless someone has had vast > experiences with it causing corruption problems for them (...which I doubt > it the case, but this post is basically a shout across the virtual office > for affirmation). > > tia! > --Michael > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
