Geoff Flight wrote: > Breaching privacy but not being identifiable is hardly ok. Some things are > just wrong - such as this. The camera sound idea tho is just absurd.
Hi Geoff! Perhaps if you live in a dictatorship such as Australia or anywhere in the UK, but we have freedom of the press here. Thus, underwear pictures per se are not banned. It is tasteless, however. > If the skirt wearer has clean underwear on and is not recognizable in > the picture then it is merely tasteless. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
