And Ive scuttled each of those 9 and it was exceedingly easy. Your
'argument' is grasping at best and ridiculous. It does in fact speak to the
legendary American arrogance that you'd even think an American WOULD be the
anti-christ!

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Michael Madigan
Sent: Thursday, 12 February 2009 9:23 AM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: RE: [OT] Pure Unadulterated Insanity


I've given you 9 specific Biblical passages that point to him as the
Anti-Christ.  You may not believe in the Bible, that's your right.

************************************************* 
1/20/2013 Eviction Notice

http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6169336


--- On Wed, 2/11/09, Geoff Flight <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Geoff Flight <[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: [OT] Pure Unadulterated Insanity
> To: "'ProFox Email List'" <[email protected]>
> Date: Wednesday, February 11, 2009, 5:21 PM
> And how can you have dialog with people who think he is the
> anti-christ?
> Same argument, flipped over.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
> Of Michael Madigan
> Sent: Thursday, 12 February 2009 8:40 AM
> To: ProFox Email List
> Subject: RE: [OT] Pure Unadulterated Insanity
> 
> 
> How can you reason with people who worship Obama as The
> Second Coming?
> 
> ************************************************* 
> 1/20/2013 Eviction Notice
> 
> http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6169336
> 
> 
> --- On Wed, 2/11/09, Bob Calco
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > From: Bob Calco <[email protected]>
> > Subject: RE: [OT] Pure Unadulterated Insanity
> > To: "'ProFox Email List'"
> <[email protected]>
> > Date: Wednesday, February 11, 2009, 5:06 PM
> > > The entire key to your argument is the word
> > 'mechanism'. You assume
> > > that
> > > such a thing exists. Why is it that we believe in
> > market forces up
> > > until the
> > > point they do something we don't like and/or
> cant
> > explain.
> > 
> > Because the Fed Reserve is not a market force. Fannie
> Mae
> > and Freddie Mac
> > are not market forces.
> > 
> > The "Community Reinvestment Act" that
> created the
> > "subprime mortgage market"
> > is not a market force. 
> > 
> > Congress is not a market force. Neither is the
> Presidency.
> > 
> > Our political process, in which many wealthy people
> (of all
> > political
> > stripes) participate, is not a market force. 
> > 
> > Terrorists and hostile foreign regimes are not market
> > forces.
> > 
> > So when you see something REALLY unusual in terms of
> normal
> > market behavior
> > -- like, oh, say, half a trillion dollars suddenly and
> > precipitously
> > vanishing from money market funds of a particular
> country
> > one fine afternoon
> > for no particular reason-- the assumption it's a
> > "market force" may not be
> > true.
> > 
> > > Oil prices
> > > have
> > > risen dramatically and then fallen right back
> before.
> > Quite simply,
> > > they
> > > were unsustainable at that price.
> > 
> > Which price? The one before the rise? The one after
> the
> > rise? Or the one
> > after the drop?
> > 
> > > Runs on the banks have occurred many
> > > many
> > > times in the past. The reasons are complex and
> many.
> > But what they
> > > aren't is
> > > conspiracy - which is what you are implying.
> > 
> > Well, I'm glad you ruled that out for me. I shall
> rest
> > easier now, thanks.
> > 
> > > < Dazzle me, Geoff. Educate me.>
> > > 
> > > Until you wind back the rhetoric and cut back on
> the
> > paranoia it is
> > > impossible to 'educate' or even debate
> you. At
> > the moment your
> > > 'soapbox' is
> > > so far away from the rest of us that you cant
> hear us.
> >  
> > Who is "we"? Again, who's on a soapbox,
> > talking to what audience?
> > 
> > Mostly I engage in OT to vent my spleen. Every once in
> a
> > while I get wrapped
> > up into thinking something I might post might persuade
> > someone of this or
> > that. I eventually realize the folly of that hope, at
> which
> > point I try to
> > just enjoy the banter.
> > 
> > - Bob
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Post Messages to: [email protected]
> > Subscription Maintenance:
> > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
> > OT-free version of this list:
> > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
> > Searchable Archive:
> http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
> > This message:
> >
>
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
> m
> > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise,
> are
> > the opinions of the author, and do not constitute
> legal or
> > medical advice. This statement is added to the
> messages for
> > those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
> 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to