I hate to break the news to you but Bob is quite wrong - and so are you. And
the proof of that statement is evident in the result. Countries (like
Australia) where there is strong regulation enjoy both a unparalleled degree
of prosperity and freedom but also a strength in our financial markets that
is relatively unaffected by the mess emanating from your shores. Proper
government intervention and regulation seeks to curtail and limit the
natural greedy impulses of the financial sector. When you look at the almost
unbelievable number and size of the rorts that are coming to light now it is
impossible to deny that govt regulation is needed.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Kevin S. Goff
Sent: Monday, 16 February 2009 3:41 PM
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Subject: RE: [OT] Federal Obligations Exceed World GDP

Geoff, I hate to break the news to you, but Bob is right.

It's government intervention that's largely to blame....not "capitalism" run
amok.

It's like blaming the depression on free-market economics - the depression
was caused by government manipulation of the monetary supply.  But since it
was done by Republicans, people mistakenly "blame" these economic disasters
on the free market.


Kevin




-----Original Message-----
From: Geoff Flight [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 11:25 PM
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Subject: RE: [OT] Federal Obligations Exceed World GDP

< Most of our current economic woes are not the result of free market run
amok
but rather government intervention and fiscal promiscuity ran amok. This is
not the same as saying regulation is bad... just that too much of the wrong
kind can bring disaster, and I think what's happening now is an illustration
of this point.>

I hope you are aware that almost nobody believes that. The lack of
regulation is generally ackcnowledged as the cause of this problem. 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Bob Calco
Sent: Monday, 16 February 2009 2:31 PM
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Subject: RE: [OT] Federal Obligations Exceed World GDP

> I'm not blaming anyone.

That's rich. News, too.

> I'm blaming EVERYONE D and R who both seemed to
> give
> this 'free market' far more freedom than it deserved.

Most of our current economic woes are not the result of free market run amok
but rather government intervention and fiscal promiscuity ran amok. This is
not the same as saying regulation is bad... just that too much of the wrong
kind can bring disaster, and I think what's happening now is an illustration
of this point.

The mortgage crisis that created the house of cards and then pulled the rug
out from under it was a direct result of long-term government intervention
in the housing market. 

Certain interventionist types felt the market was "inadequately" serving the
needs of the downtrodden, and they made new regulations to encourage the
predatory lending they now bemoan. Worse, they created these "government
sponsored entities" or GSEs, which managed to elude any regulatory
frameworks, these very same people say are now needed. 

I merely pointed out a fact that it was Republicans who wanted to regulate
the GSEs---a fact that is totally lost on most people because of the
shameful reporting in this country--and all of a sudden you became Mr. Pox
on Both Their Houses. I have repeated many times, and argued fervently, that
both parties are to blame...but you still call me a partisan.

Our "health care" cost crisis is the same... too much of the wrong kind of
regulation and intervention. 

But I know.. don't bother me with facts. You want to believe Oprah.

I don't think these "crises" are accidents. The whole way government gets
involved in most of these social problems seems designed to fail... and then
I learn about things like the Cloward-Piven Strategy, and it all starts to
come together, especially when you understand Alinsky as a key figure in its
inspiration, and the relationship of both Obama and Hillary to Alinsky.

I have evidence to back up my claim that you simply choose to ignore so you
can sit back and lob assertions about my mental health instead of actually
examining the issues.

I personally am OK with a lot more regulation of trade than I am of internal
market dynamics, but neither I nor any conservatives I'm aware of were
trying to DE-regulate the housing market in 2005. Quite the contrary. 

If you paid any attention whatsoever to the links I sent you you'd realize
you aren't paying any attention to my actual arguments. Either that or
you're just being disingenuous.

> Mixed economies
> are
> the worlds successful ones - ones where fee capitalism is allowed to
> reign
> within the limits of regulation.

If you consider 20% unemployment and relying on actual superpowers to take
care of your national defense "successful" I guess.

> It is why Australia isn't in the mess
> you
> are in. Forget the partisan politics. Your economic failure is the
> product
> of decades of faulty financial philosophy and under-regulation.

I disagree, I think it's excessive regulation of the wrong kind, and lack of
regulation of government sponsored entities, that got us where we are. That
plus a total lack of spending discipline of the federal government---again,
no free market entity, that.

It's popular to say we have laissez faire economics reigning supreme, but
it's so far from the truth that I wonder how well you mind is tethered to
reality?

- Bob


[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to