> < Lack of regulation of WHAT caused "it"? It's not enough to say "Lack > of > regulation".> > > I thought I would write a RESPONSE and not a TREATISE. Perhaps you > could try > the same. Bottom line tho is that a failure of CORRECT REGULATION > (happy > now?) is the cause and is acknowledged by the vast majority.
Now you are descending into truism and overly broad definitions. No, because when the regulators are the problem, that's vastly different than saying the free market was the problem. We all acknowledge people operate on self-interest. Or what you call, pejoratively, greed/lust for power. Our system was designed to mitigate these competing interests, and worked well for a spell. It's been corrupted by the two party system and the ever increasing size of the federal trough. Why you believe government regulators are exempt from human nature, I'd like to hear. - Bob _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
