> Ask a fair sample of world population and you will find most people wil > agree that America is over-supplied with some pretty weird people. > Being the > kind of person you are I am sure you are unaware that media outlets in > the > continent and Australia even have a 'Only in America..." category on > oddball media reporting.
Idle assertions, whose value are zero even if true. You simply aren't going to persuade me by opinion polls. I don't decide matters of truth by whose popular today. > > Stop being so sensitive. With every post you add more to your > Conspiracy > Theorist score. But I'm sure you wil find a way to reinterpret this > post and > take a crack at my faith or my theology or my relationship with God. > There > was another point about Conspiracy Theorists that I left off. Most CTs > will > eventually attack a person's religious or spiritual beliefs. I'm not > exactly > sure why but it remains a consistent feature. So tell me again why you > must > repeatedly attack my Christianity. Go back through the archives. You questioned mine first, and then you proceeded to ignore my points, instead trying to argue I am either crazy or some kind of conspiracy theorist, rather than address my points. The more you add to you "definition" of a "CT" the more these seemingly separate points add up to "Anybody who makes Goeff look like a lazy ass in a debate is a CT". > Is your argument so weak that it > can't > stand on its own merits without a sideways swipe at something not > germane to > the topic? This is rich coming from you. You don't make any arguments, you make assertions, usually about how popular your opinion is compared to mine, or how crazy my opinion sounds to some mythical majority, or abstract comments about some mythical category of person you think you can pigeonhole me into, then you proceed to make it about me and my flaws instead of the topic at hand. > As for your pathetic Daniel comment; Ive both studied and > TAUGHT > OT prophecy in relationship to Daniel and eschatology in general. I knew you'd get the reference and was quite sure you'd fail to see why I picked it. I would love to know what you know about eschatology. > > Now back to the topic at hand? What topic? You keep trying to make it about me, while I keep blowing your arguments out of the water based on facts, point-by-point refutation and real multi-layered arguments. Yes I have gone on a few rants about you, mostly in response to your making it personal. I regret those, but enjoy them anyway since you're not changing your tactics at all. Part of me wants to hit a reset button and find some neutral topic we can "try again" on. We must have some kind of common ground, say, on the faith. I would like to believe it is on the matter of salvation or something. I am as in shocked awe of your political opinions as you are of mine. I am not sure this proves anything. If we are both Christians, we must both be doing something wrong for this to go so completely down a sinking sandpit. - Bob _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
