On Wed, February 25, 2009 2:33 pm, Jon Westcot wrote: > Hi Dave, Tracy, et al.: > > > Thanks for the suggestions. It seems that SYS(0) works like a champ. > > > HOWEVER.... > > > Now I'm being asked to apparently "sign" the executable to avoid having > Vista ask if they really want to run the application. The user sent me > the following comment: > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > windows prompts me to run the software because of it being an unknown > publisher, but I think that is an easy fix? Can you change? > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > Well, I could, if I knew how to do this. Or even what to do to create > such a signature or certificate. Can someone enlighten me? This is > essentially an in-house application; I just happen to be maintaining it > from 1800 or so miles away. ;) > > > Thanks for any help any of you can share. (Oh, I tried to search for > this on the ProFox search website but, without knowing exactly what it was > I > was trying to find, I was having a lot of trouble finding anything useful > that wasn't talking about SSL Certificates for web pages.)
Tell them to just ignore that and proceed. That is the EASIEST and CHEAPEST solution. To go the route of getting it "signed" is expensive and not worth it, imo, if I understand the process. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
