I don't know Tracy - but it is very frustrating because I believe it is the reason behind our "diff" tool showing up spurious differences between VCXs - the same problem ocurs with SCXs and VCXs ....
Paul Tracy Pearson wrote: > I see what you're talking about now. The checkbox alignment property appears > to have changed from the default. > > PEMSTATUS(SYS(1270), "alignment", 0) && (with the mouse over the checkbox) > returns .T. > > It shouldn't. I wonder if this is related to the "CENTERED" property they > added for use in a GRID. > > Tracy > > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Newton > Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 3:58 PM > > Further testing - this time in VFP6 - and everything works as expected: > > 1. Create new form test > 2. Add checkbox > 3. Change alignment to right > 4. Save form > 5. Use test.scx, browse and confirm that properties field contains > Alignment = 1 > 6. Close table > 7. Edit form - change checkbox alignment to Left - Save form > 8. Use test.scx, browse and confirm that properties field contains > Alignment = 0 > 9. Close table > 7. Edit form - highlight alignment property, right-click and choose > reset to default - Save form > 8. Use test.scx, browse and confirm that properties field does not > contain an entry for Alignment > > BUT IT DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY IN VFP9 ! > > (Please excuse shouting ....) > > Paul Newton > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
