Jean Laeremans wrote: > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 10:22 PM, MB Software Solutions General Account > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Protectionism is NOT a dirty word. > > oc not, being simple isn't that bad either
It just seems that the prevailing corporate attitude (for over a decade+) has been "let's embrace this global economy and use foreign workers that won't cost as much." Now while that might make sense financially, there's a price to pay for not investing in your native countrymen. If they're not working, they won't be able to pay their bills and won't be contributing to the tax base, either. I'm no economist but that seems to make perfect sense for "the perfect storm" so to speak, where the infrastructure collapses due to the money leaving the country. Or...many suffer to make a very few very rich. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
