Stephen Russell wrote: > 2009/4/10 Ricardo Aráoz <[email protected]>: > > >> Nooo. I think they killed the fox for our sake, so that we would be >> forced out and find Python, and Ed give us Dabo. >> > ------------------------ > > How did they kill it? Is it no longer working? Or has the quality of > other developer tools open source or non lured developers away from > VFP? > Sorry, you are absolutely right, they didn't kill the fox. Everybody knows that! My bad. > > > OK, I'll bite. What innovation do you really need? > > Would you expect the owner of FoxPro to in essence rewrite it to > achieve the new features you want / expect? This would take into > consideration the 2 gig limit and other bla bla bla. > > If they did that would that bring people flooding back? > Let's see, if there is NO chance that people will come back to the fox then. Why don't they give the code to the public? Why don't they let OTHER people keep developing it instead of discontinuing it? Oh! I know! It's because they want to present quality in the developer tool space.
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
