On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Pete Theisen <[email protected]> wrote:
>> What year did M$ say you couldn't use 95 anymore and the minimum you >> could put on a machine was 98? > > Hi Stephen! > > It was around 01, 02, 03 - really don't remember. I do remember the > machines we had been donated wouldn't run 98. > -- OK that is what I thought. Considering what was happening in the industry at that time with respect to viruses and OS security I have to agree with microsquish on telling you "NO Don't use that!" Purely from a security standpoint and your company being a medical services facility. 95 was the worst and we all knew it back then. I can see your frustration from the cash expenditure POV. We all hate to spend money when we have little of it, and starting out a new practice $$ is scarce. -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer Web and Windows Development Independent Contractor Memphis TN 901.246-0159 _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
