On Wed, April 29, 2009 4:12 pm, Gilbert M. Hale wrote: > All I know is I am glad I tossed my hat into the PostgreSQL ring, > although the Advantage SQL does look interesting. I just felt a dual > license for MySQL left things too loose for my comfort. Lucky call on my > part... Then again, perhaps Oracle will do good things for MySQL since > free is better than not free. Oh, wait a minute, that may not be quite > right... Never mind...
The VFP9-MySQL solutions I've got out there now working will not be affected, imo, by the acquisition by Oracle. They cannot, imo, put anything into place that would ill-affect my existing solutions. I may not be able to upgrade for whatever personal/business reason moving forward, but what works today should still work tomorrow and the day after that, etc etc, imo. Right? Because I've designed with the n-tier approach, I'm going to take one of my solutions and see if I can get the PostgreSQL backend solution as well. The only place I'd need to change things would be where there's MySQL-specific SQL that doesn't work the same in PostgreSQL. Mike Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC President, Chief Software Architect http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com http://twitter.com/mbabcock16 _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
