> This is just obfuscation by the defense attorneys. Code doesn't have > to conform to any standards if it works correctly. >
Perhaps, but just wait until "the experts" get done testifying re: industry standards. Huh? What industry? Whose standards? My software works great, never crashes unless there is a hardware or OS instigated problem (then my software still does not crash other than a result of some other issue), and has only been reviewed once (by Ed Leafe) before I hit the commercial market with it. I am certain an attorney could get plenty of experts to say how crappily it was written (could be true, but it is the functionality and stability that count, yes?). I actually feel badly for the vendor, but that progressive average of averages (mis)calculation error is pretty bad - assuming it was not remarked out and good code was actually being used <g>... Gil > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:profoxtech- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan > Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 2:07 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [NF] Code review anyone? > > > This is just obfuscation by the defense attorneys. Code doesn't have > to conform to any standards if it works correctly. > > > --- On Tue, 5/26/09, Gilbert M. Hale <[email protected]> wrote: > > > From: Gilbert M. Hale <[email protected]> > > Subject: RE: [NF] Code review anyone? > > To: [email protected] > > Date: Tuesday, May 26, 2009, 2:00 PM > > So, NJ may get a refund... How > > about all the convictions that may just get > > overturned that relied on the results of that unit? I > > know that if I had > > been convicted based on the readings from that unit, > > whether I was actually > > guilty or not, I would be all over that. But, I would > > be looking for the > > conviction to be overturned, followed by a civil lawsuit > > seeking damages due > > to my life being disrupted due to the faulty readings > > (go ahead, prove I > > was wrong!). Poor bastards, they are dead meat. > > There is no way they will > > be able to survive this - probably a good thing as I am > > certain lots of > > folks who were "OJ Innocent" likely got convicted based on > > faluty readings. > > Did y'all catch how they were calculating average > > values? Progressive > > average of averages. Even a 5th grade student ought > > to know better than > > that! Then again, I should also <g>. > > > > Good Article. > > > > > > Gil > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [email protected] > > [mailto:profoxtech- > > > [email protected]] > > On Behalf Of David Smith > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 1:49 PM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: RE: [NF] Code review anyone? > > > > > > I wish they'd do this for the voting machines! > > > > > > Dave > > > > > > David Smith > > > Systems Administrator > > > Doan Family of Dealerships > > > (585) 352-6600 ext.1730 > > > [email protected] > > > www.upstatedigitools.com > > > > > > This message may contain confidential and/or > > proprietary information, > > > and is > > > intended for the person/entity for whom it was > > originally addressed. > > > Any use > > > by others is strictly prohibited > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [email protected] > > [mailto:profoxtech- > > > [email protected]] > > On > > > Behalf Of Stephen Russell > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 1:25 PM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: [NF] Code review anyone? > > > > > > What if you are ordered by the courts? > > > > > > <http://www.dwi.com/new-jersey/state-v-chun> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Stephen Russell > > > Sr. Production Systems Programmer > > > Web and Windows Development > > > Independent Contractor > > > Memphis TN > > > > > > 901.246-0159 > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
