On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Bob Calco<[email protected]> wrote:
> http://bit.ly/X1aSk
> Obviously Obama couldn't have anyone in charge of GM who might know more
> than he does about the auto industry.
----------------------------------------


I am not sure that someone who LIVES the car industry is wise for CEO
over the past 10 years.  The world just came off of a boom but the car
companies could at best discount the crap out of vehicles to make
sales.

There were so many different campaigns when money was flowing like
lava from the volcano.  Employee pricing.  WTF?  Are sales so bad that
you have to pull this gimmick?

Was it any one thing?  Unions, Investments in Real Estate, high steel
prices, crappy parts now standard in OEM, EPA pushing higher economy,
poor R&D projects that didn't pan out, funding of all popular sports,
tremendous advertising budgets, changes in health care costs for
hundreds of thousands or millions of workers and retirees, buying any
auto company that looked like it was outside of your market, fighting
to get into China and India with a car that they would purchase,.... ?

These are all above the Lean Manufacturing we all so often hear about
today, right?

What part of that list will an insider have a better advantage with?
Should they come out of MFG, Finance, HR, R&D, Testing, International
Law, ....?


-- 
Stephen Russell
Sr. Production Systems Programmer
Web and Windows Development
Independent Contractor
Memphis TN

901.246-0159

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to