I had to disable the MS Anti-Spyware because it just slowed my machine to a crawl. I bet this will be the same.
--- On Thu, 6/18/09, Allen <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Allen <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: [NF] the end of Symantec? > To: [email protected] > Date: Thursday, June 18, 2009, 9:42 PM > As I use avg im not bothered anyway > Allen > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] > On > Behalf Of gil hale > Sent: 18 June 2009 18:50 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [NF] the end of Symantec? > > Free at what cost? If it fails to work as well as > Symantec's AV solutions, > who pays (dollars or time)? M$, or the hapless victim > who was foolish to > think that somehow this time for sure M$ actually got it > right? My money is > not on M$ to provide a thorough solution. > > > _______________________________________________ > Post Messages to: [email protected] > Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox > This message: > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are > the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or > medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for > those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. > _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
