At 11:12 2009-07-22, Ted Roche <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Gene Wirchenko<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > You debase both religion and our field with this.
>
>I shan't get into a flamewar on this. I have strong opinions on both,
>both [OT] and [NF] but let's postpone those to another day.
"religion" gets used as a smear word too often and shuts down
intelligent, reasoned discourse.
BTW, what does the "[NF]" tag mean?
> > He just does not see the problems that *I* have had over the
> > years with the billing calculations (the hairiest part of the
> > system).
>
>That sounds like an education issue. More transparency in where the
>costs of development are might help him to see alternative solutions
>are required.
Since I am at a different location, this is somewhat
difficult. Besides, he pays me to solve those problems. ultimately,
though, he has to be involved.
> > Since I am requiring some of his time to get this going, the
> > expense appears high to him.
>
>That's an interesting turn of phrase, and I'm not sure exactly what
>that means. But it sounds like it might just be the crux of the
>problem.
He is the owner of the company. His time is valuable. Right
now, business is tough. His time is correspondingly more valuable.
Yes, it is the crux. I have made a number of changes over the
years purely because of this point. Nonetheless, I do require *some*
of his time.
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
