At 10:41 2009-08-24, Stephen Russell <[email protected]> wrote: >On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Alan Bourke<[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 08:56 -0500, "Stephen Russell" > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> iPod nor iPhone listed here. > > > > Nope because they're both killer apps (especially when they blow up and > > Apple swoop in with the heavy-handed legal threats to try and shut you > > up).
>http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/personal_tech/article6736587.ece >That happens all the time when a vendor pays you off for a product >failure. I consider it settling out of court. If they only gave the How would you know? Is everyone not keeping silent after all? >girl a replacement device and expected silence well hahahahaha. If >they gave the replacement device and say 500 pounds that is a whole >different ball game. You would want your customers to speak highly of you, no? If Apple has to have it kept quiet, then maybe, they are not doing such a good job. [snip] Sincerely, Gene Wirchenko _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
