Well, every time I take an optimistic position I regret it. Hence, my native
skepticism.

Today, my eldest son's middle school called to inform me *at the end of the
day* that they changed their minds---now it's up to each teacher in the
school to decide whether they were watching Obama's speech, and all of them
were, though as parents we have the right to object in writing, and our
objections would be respected.

Ditto, my younger son's elementary school - the teacher had a nice printed
sticky note informing us that unless we objected, they were going to watch
the speech because "it is part of the curriculum."

So, neither of my sons are going to school on Tuesday. Period.

Here are my reasons:

1. The "lesson plans" around his address, though modified slightly, remain.
This is total bullshit.

2. I pay the county to educate my children in essentials (reading, writing
and arithmetic), not sensitize and indoctrinate them. Some of the middle
schoolers in my eldest son's age bracket will be voters in 2012, and this is
plainly an attempt to push name recognition for a politician. 

3. I don't trust Obama. At all. On any level. He is not who he says he is,
does not believe the things he says he believes, and is doing things he has
not advertised. He surrounds himself with *evil* whack job "czars" like Van
Jones, and John Holdren, Cass Susstein, Mark Lloyd, and Ezekiel Emmanuel,
and countless others who represent a dangerous, radical group of sociopaths,
and is himself a student of an ideologue (Saul Alinsky) who literally
dedicated his magnum opus -- "Rules for Radicals" -- to Lucifer, a book
about how to fool the middle class into its own destruction.

4. I don't believe his "academic" credentials. A so-called Constitutional
scholar, he is frustrated by the Constitution because it is a list of what
the government cannot do, instead of a list of what the government must do.
This is his own framing of the issue. A so-called prolific writer, his first
book -- "Dreams from My Father" -- is chock full of themes, turns of phrase,
anecdotes and writing style lifted almost directly from Bill Ayers'
"Fugitive Days". Whether he wrote it or Ayers I don't know, and I don't
care. The clear, verifiable connection is enough, considering the pains he
went through to deny he knew Ayers well---another demonstrably false
assertion. (Incidentally, Mark Lloyd, another of his radical advisers, and
an open admirer of Hugo Chavez, co-founded the "Weather Underground" with
Bill Ayers... there are so many connections here that the media's failure to
vet this lunatic is criminal, IMHO.) His own book exposes his underlying
falseness in plain terms -- describing how he lied to his mother about his
drug addictions in the same breath as describing how he learned to fool
people into thinking he's not got some big chip on his shoulder, and how he
acts like a blank screen onto which people can project their hopes and
dreams. He is a narcissist, and a liar. Moreover his so called credentials
are sealed -- not one grade he earned, or paper he wrote, while in college,
is accessible to anyone.

5. The federal government has no goddamn business in the classroom. I
opposed Bush's "No Child Left Behind Act" as well (something he co-wrote
with none other than Ted Kennedy I might add.). 

I am going to do two things I really never wanted to do:

1. Buy a gun;
2. Participate in a protest -- namely the Sept 12 Tea Party.

Enough is enough is enough. These people must be turned out of office in
2010 and 2012. 

- Bob







_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to