BTW, I also won't mention the irony of Bill Ayers' Sept 11, 2001, interview
in the NYT in which he complained that he "didn't do enough" in the 60's as
the leader of the communist Weather Underground.......

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Bob Calco
> Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 3:32 PM
> To: 'ProFox Email List'
> Subject: RE: [OT] Literary Lion Obama will Roar No More
> 
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Bob Calco
> <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > Just out of curiosity, Stephen, does it bother you at all on any
> > level that
> > > Ayers ghost wrote Dreams?
> > -----------------------------------------
> >
> > On any level no.
> >
> > I feel deep in my heart that everyone's mindset morphed and matured
> > from the sixties into what they are present day.
> 
> OK, so if I showed you that Ayers was in Caracas as recently as 2006,
> praising Hugo Chavez' revolution as a model for the rest of the world,
> would
> it bother you?
> 
> http://billayers.wordpress.com/2006/11/
> 
> (I won't even mention Obama campaigning as US senator for communist
> thug
> Raila Odinga in Kenya around this time in this same breath...
> http://bit.ly/3Y0sN8 )
> 
> None of this bothers you?
> 
> - Bob
> 
> >
> >
> > --
> > Stephen Russell
> > Sr. Production Systems Programmer
> > SQL Server DBA
> > Web and Winform Development
> > Independent Contractor
> > Memphis TN
> >
> > 901.246-0159
> >
> >
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to