Bob Calco wrote: > BTW, after I've burned you for heresy we might start trying to figure >> out how many angels will fit in a pin's head. >> > > Heresy? It's the only interpretation of Jesus' direct promises of his > immanent parousia in that generation IMHO that makes sense, and it fits with > what Daniel and John predicted, once you decode their symbolism in the > context of the "those of us who are alive and remain" (the apostles). It doesn't fit the teachings of THE church, so it's heresy. Period. > It's > the main reason I don't think Obama is "the" anti-Christ per se, but one of > many antichrists and false prophets about which Scripture speaks, who > deceive many Christians into working iniquity. Just happens to be one in a > particularly powerful position, which is never a good thing. > Scripture says that happens BEFORE the final battle, which you say has already happened. What's more, according to your timetable we have already risen from the grave, been judged, and are now in hell. LOL
> > My main reasons for supporting Israel over the Palestinians is political and > not theological per se--they're simply more civilized, the term being > understood over there on a relative basis. So I guess you'd have supported Mussolini against the Ethiopians on accounts of the italians being the more 'civilized' party. Same thing Nazis vs. gypsies, or africans? (the comparison is absolutely valid, considering Israel is a fascist country) > I don't support them for > scriptural reasons, like many of my Republican friends do who happen to be > dispensationalists ................ > blah blah blah blah blah blah . .. ... .... loads of boring bollocks snipped .... ... .. . >>>>> Jesus bless you! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Lucifer give you light! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Ha! Is that like ACORN giving legal and tax advice? >>> >>> >>> >> You missed it. You being some kind of a linguist and all I thought >> you'd >> get a reference to the meaning of the name 'lucifer' and the 'light' >> he's supposed to give you. Or maybe I'm missing the ACORN joke........ >> yes, probably both are lousy attempts at humour. >> > > Well I did get the "light" reference (Lucifer once upon a time being an > "angel of light" and all that) Nope, Lucifer meaning 'carrier of light' (latin) or 'morning star' (hence the 'light' reference). BTW, have you ever noticed Lucifer was an angel? But AFAIK God granted free will to the human beings, not to the angels. So...... if he had no free will, how could he have rebelled? Or why would he be held accountable for it? --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
